Showing posts with label patient harm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label patient harm. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Collateral Damage in the Opioid Epidemic


I wish I were writing this blog to report good news. Unfortunately, things are no different today than they were in 2011 when the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report “Relieving Pain in America” was written. Instead, and even though the IOM report spirited the drafting and publishing of the National Pain Strategy, things have gotten much worse. Hardly a week goes by that I don’t read about a fellow patient taking their life because the source of the physical pain was inadequately treated and their emotional pain unbearable because of feeling judged, many times by those they seek for help and support.

The opioid epidemic is very real and I do not mean to minimize that fact in any way. However, it is now painfully obvious that the CDC guidelines for opioid prescribing have not helped those who live with addiction. In fact, the guidelines have led to more deaths, not fewer. The forgotten, stigmatized, and judged, people living with persistent pain are now joining the death toll. That’s why I am sharing this article.If you have been injured, I encourage you to use the links you find in the following letter. Or if you know someone like a recent victim, please encourage his or her family to take action. 


___________________________________________________________________________


Find helpful links for finding your senator, representative, and governor; medical organizations, and government health related websites, your states attorney general, your state’s pain care laws and more in "The Advocate's Corner" header of this blog.
___________________________________________________________________________


Dear concerned fellow person living with chronic pain,

It is rewarding to write books, articles and blogs to help others manage chronic pain and illness. But coping strategies alone are often not enough. Opioids allow many patients the ability to participate in things they otherwise couldn’t. I advocate for moving complimentary therapies into mainstream but these days, the bulk of my time is donated to the crisis created by limited patient access, if any, to their opioids.

Because of the volume of requests for help and the need to meet the demands for my own care, I investigated information to help you with your personal situation.

It’s important to understand what is happening. Physicians are caught in the middle. The DEA crackdown on prescribing opioids has made them fearful of because of perceived threats to their livelihood. On the other hand, if patient harm results from negligence or abandonment, the provider can be  liable for that too. When a patient is fired, the physician has an ethical obligation to ensure a patient’s care is uninterrupted. However, the DEA, the CDC, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid, and or other government agencies have no liability for the results of their actions. 
We have the ability to hold the right people accountable by providing factual evidence. Evidence includes things, such as:
  • A written letter from your physician stating his/her reasons for stopping your pain care. (If you don’t have one, demand it.)
  • Chronological documentation your physician failed to provide ample notice for finding another provider. 
  • Following are other things to consider:

  1.  Is your physician negligent if no one is willing to continue your care?
  2.  Is your provider fearful to bridge the gap because of the CDC Opioid Prescribing Guidelines or other governing bodies?
  3. Is your provider using the changes as an excuse to abandon care?" Pain that does not abate is a reason to seek medical care, but physicians often feel helpless because treating chronic pain is complex. 
  4.  When the standard of patient care is breached (i.e. abandonment, negligence, or malpractice) and that breach causes harm, there is legal recourse. Currently, three things affect the changing standards, as I see it, (1) the influence of government agencies (2) lobbying by PROP--follow the Phoenix House money trail, and (3) the American Medical Association's decision to cut pain as the 5th vital sign from routine assessment, affecting the standard of pain care negatively.  
  5. Why isn't acupuncture, counseling by a provider trained in pain care, therapeutic manual therapies, or other proven modalities also considered when making changes in the standard of care? Answer: insurance lobbying, another player identified in the pain care market. 
  6. Patient outcome is seldom discussed even though it should be the driving factor of all patient care standards. 

*If you are forced to sign a contract, read it. A contract is between TWO people and may be litigated if either party fails to uphold their part of the contract. The physician’s responsibilities toward your care should also be provided. 

 The laws to protect both the physician and patient are very gray in today’s stormy climate.

  • The physician must  provide evidence as to why they withdraw  care. Yet, some may feel protected by the CDC guidelines. They are not. The guidelines are not LAW!
  • Failure to provide information such as copies of relevant medical records, treatment notes, tests, etc. to those who are continuing your care is a breech. This does not meet patient care standards.
  • Voice recordings or notes in your medical record that the DEA or other government agency created a burden on the physician’s ability to treat pain are helpful for both the physician and patient, but  difficult to obtain unless a case is being litigated.
  • Documentation of refused emergency care, such as treatment, hospital admission for withdrawal symptoms, suicidal ideation, or any other untoward effect is mandatory. (This is not the same as expecting an ER to continue your outpatient pain care.) 
  • Your loved one has committed suicide and there is documentation abandonment or untreated/undertreated pain was the cause. (many statistics are likely skewed because of the inability to collect life insurance and the stigma associated with suicide and chronic pain). 

*As a patient, you also have a duty. If you are unreasonably demanding, non-compliant (i.e. abusing, diverting, or misusing opioids), or threatening to the physician or staff, you are not protected.

If you have been abandoned and have evidence of harm resulting from changes in your pain care, you have recourse thanks to required reporting in Senate Bill S.483, Ensuring Patient Access and Effective Drug Enforcement Act of 2016, signed into law April 2016. [addendum, but is now in jeopardy, 2/6/2018]


Harm constitutes:

  • pain and suffering
  • cost of additional treatment
  • loss of earning capacity, and
  • loss of the ability to enjoy life

If you have sufficient evidence, please submit it to the attorney general for your state, which you can find at  NAAG | Who's My AG?   If anyone is providing evidence on someone else’s behalf make that disclosure and provide contact information.

Remember, if it wasn't documented, in didn't happen. Gather your arsenal and become empowered. Record what you can, when you can. The attorney general needs concrete evidence to move forward. Make sure they know you know they are required to report your case as part of S.483.  [addendum, which could now be in jeopardy].  I suggest sending a copy of your letter to your attorney to those you feel are appropriate. Be sure to mention the pain care laws for your state (link is courtesy of the Academy of Integrative Pain Management, SPPAN) or by typing “your state’s name state law on pain care” in your browser search engine and select from the results.

Because every case is different, each of us must demand our rights to be treated with dignity and respect. There is opportunity in adversity. Rome wasn’t built in a day, nor will our cries for help be solved quickly, but we must have hope. Despite what many think, those in chronic pain are tough. We overcome hurdles on a regular basis.

I recommend joining an advocacy group to help you stay abreast of recent newsworthy information and/or fight for our rights in Washington.

See The PAINS Project for links to their steering committee members for additional information. 


In healing,,Celeste


(Signature line appended, April 2018)


Celeste Cooper, RN / Author, Freelancer, Advocate

Think adversity?-See opportunity!



~ • ~ • ~ • ~ • ~ • ~

Learn more about Celeste’s books here. Subscribe to posts by using the information in the upper right hand corner or use the share buttons to share with others. 

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

To whom it may concern—American College of Rheumatology… Criteria for Diagnosing Fibromyalgia, by Celeste Cooper


Following is a letter I wrote to the American College of Rheumatology, as promised in my blog

Fibromyalgianess—Patient Harm: 
The Facts and the Effects of Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria

You can find the blog/article HERE
On Sharecare HERE.


Praeludium - Prelude


Having a well-researched, unbiased tool for diagnosing fibromyalgia is imperative to change the way fibromyalgia is judged and treated physically, emotionally, and socially. The correct diagnosis of patients participating in clinical trials is crucial to study results and the ability to secure further research funding. The right research can make a difference in the lives of an estimated five million adult Americans (NIAMS) and of hundreds of millions of fibromyalgia patients worldwide.



November 3, 2014

American College of Rheumatology
acr@rheumatology.org
arhp@rheumatology.org
foundation@rheumatology.org

Marian T. Hannan Editor, Arthritis Care & Research DSc, MPH
hannan@hsl.harvard.edu

To whom it may concern:

I am an RN and pain advocate as part of the Pain Action Alliance to Implement a National Strategy (http://PainsProject.org). I once wrote continuing education programs for the Missouri State Board of Nursing, and I practiced as a legal nurse consultant holding a degree in paralegal studies. I am presently a fibromyalgia expert on Sharecare.com, and I am a published author of several recognized chronic pain self-help books. I am a guest columnist for Kansas City Nursing News. I am also a person living with chronic pain.

I sit in angst because the healthcare industry, of which I have spent most of my adult life, is entertaining the demeaning label of “fibromyalgianess.” I ask, how are we ever to change the way pain is perceived, judged, and treated as set forth in the Institute of Medicine Report, “Relieving Pain in America” if such disingenuous labeling gains general acceptance? This term was coined by Dr. Frederick Wolfe et al. As I am very concerned regarding Dr. Wolfe’s capricious attitude in his published papers on fibromyalgia, I would like to to know if the ACR has formally adopted the Wolf 2010 criteria for diagnosing fibromyalgia.

If we are to move to a biopsychosocial model of healthcare delivery, one cannot use labels that harm patients and their ability to cope. When we enter a physician’s office with hope and leave in tears, our needs are hijacked. Such neglect delays appropriate treatment and assessment of comorbid conditions.

I await a timely response to my request from the American College of Rheumatology on the formal acceptance of the Wolfe , et al. 2010 criteria. Thank you for your time and your consideration in the effort to promote the unbiased reporting of rheumatology research studies.

Sincerely, Celeste Cooper, RN, BSN, Diploma in Paralegal Studies
EMail: Celeste@TheseThree.com
Website: http://TheseThree.com Update http://CelesteCooper.com (April 2015)


cc:

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
National Institute of Health – Pain Consortium
CDC, Office of Science Quality
Jan Chambers, President, National Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain Association
Karen Lee Richards, Fibromyalgia Editor, Pro Health, and Chronic Pain Health Guide, Health Central (Co-Founder National Fibromyalgia Association)
Robert Twillman, PhD, American Academy of Pain Management
Kim Kimminau, PhD, Associate Professor; Director, Center for Community Health Improvement, Kansas University School of Medicine (KUMC)
Myra J. Christopher, Kathleen M. Foley Chair in Pain and Palliative Care at the Center for Practical Bioethics and Principal Investigator of the Pain Action Alliance to Implement a National Strategy (PAINSproject.org)
Cindy Leyland, Project Director, Pain Action Alliance to Implement a National Strategy (PAINSproject.org).
Pat Anson, National Pain Report
American Chronic Pain Association
National Patient Advocate Foundation
The State Pain Policy Advocacy Network
US Pain Foundation


Celeste's Website

Celeste's Website
Click on the picture